Send one email.

Subject: Please support Ordinance D-FY27-003 (ALPR removal)

Dear Councilor [Name],

My name is [Name], and I live on [Street] in Bridgewater. I'm writing to ask you to support Ordinance D-FY27-003, currently before the Rules and Procedures Committee, which would end the Town's use of Flock automated license plate readers.

My concern is simple: these cameras create a searchable record of where Bridgewater residents drive and when. One reading means little. Thousands of readings, combined across cameras and towns, build a detailed picture of a person's daily life. That data is not held by our police department. It sits on a private company's platform, where access, retention, and sharing are governed by vendor systems and contracts rather than by our community.

Bridgewater residents never voted for this. The ordinance gives us a framework to review surveillance technology deliberately instead of by default.

Please advance D-FY27-003 out of committee intact and support it at second reading.

Respectfully,
[Name]
[Street], Bridgewater

Subject: D-FY27-003: what are we paying for, and what do we own?

Dear Councilor [Name],

I'm [Name], a Bridgewater resident on [Street]. I'm writing about Ordinance D-FY27-003, the ALPR ordinance now in Rules and Procedures.

Before the Town spends another dollar on Flock cameras, I'd like answers to three questions:

1. What does this system cost annually, including renewals?
2. What does the Town actually own? My understanding is the data lives on Flock's private platform, not ours.
3. What is the Town's liability exposure if that data is breached, misused, or shared with agencies we never approved?

If the answers are "recurring subscription fees, nothing, and unclear," then this is a bad deal independent of the privacy questions. The ordinance's 45-day implementation report would put every contract, grant, and data-sharing agreement on the public record. That transparency alone is worth passing it.

Please support D-FY27-003.

Regards,
[Name]
[Street], Bridgewater

Subject: Supporting D-FY27-003

Dear Councilor [Name],

My name is [Name] and I've lived in Bridgewater for [X] years. I'm asking you to support Ordinance D-FY27-003.

Here's what this looks like in practice. My car passes these cameras taking my kids to school, going to church, driving to medical appointments, visiting family. Each trip becomes a timestamped record in a database owned by a private company and searchable by agencies outside our town. Nobody asked me. There was no notice, no vote, no meaningful choice.

I'm not against the police having tools. The ordinance preserves normal police work: manual plate checks, incident-specific investigations, evidence lawfully obtained. What it ends is the automatic, continuous logging of everyone's movements, all the time, on the chance it's useful later. That's not how we do things in this town.

Please move D-FY27-003 forward.

Thank you,
[Name]
[Street], Bridgewater

Subject: Support D-FY27-003

Councilor [Name],

I'm a Bridgewater resident at [Street] and I support Ordinance D-FY27-003 ending the Town's use of automated license plate readers. A private company should not hold a searchable record of where our residents drive. Please advance it out of committee without weakening amendments and vote yes.

[Name]